top of page

BSA Section 149-158|Section 150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157 BSA|Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Bare Act

Section 149 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Questions lawful in cross- examination.


When a witness is cross-examined, he may, in addition to the questions hereinbefore referred to, be asked any questions which tend—

(a) to test his veracity; or

(b) to discover who he is and what is his position in life; or

(c) to shake his credit, by injuring his character, although the answer to such questions might tend directly or indirectly to criminate him, or might expose or tend directly or indirectly to expose him to a penalty or forfeiture:


Provided that in a prosecution for an offence under section 64, section 65, section 66, section 67, section 68, section 69, section 70 or section 71 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 or for attempt to commit any such offence, where the question of consent is an issue, it shall not be permissible to adduce evidence or to put questions in the cross-examination of the victim as to the general immoral character, or previous sexual experience, of such victim with any person for proving such consent or the quality of consent.


Section 150 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


When witness to be compelled to answer.


If any such question relates to a matter relevant to the suit or proceeding, the provisions of section 137 shall apply thereto.


Section 151 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Court to decide when question shall be asked and when witness compelled to answer.


(1) If any such question relates to a matter not relevant to the suit or proceeding, except in so far as it affects the credit of the witness by injuring his character, the Court shall decide whether or not the witness shall be compelled to answer it, and may, if it thinks fit, warn the witness that he is not obliged to answer it.


(2) In exercising its discretion, the Court shall have regard to the following considerations, namely:—

(a) such questions are proper if they are of such a nature that the truth of the imputation conveyed by them would seriously affect the opinion of the Court as to the credibility of the witness on the matter to which he testifies;


(b) such questions are improper if the imputation which they convey relates to matters so remote in time, or of such a character, that the truth of the imputation would not affect, or would affect in a slight degree, the opinion of the Court as to the credibility of the witness on the matter to which he testifies;


(c) such questions are improper if there is a great disproportion between the importance of the imputation made against the witness's character and the importance of his evidence;


(d) the Court may, if it sees fit, draw, from the witness's refusal to answer, the inference that the answer if given would be unfavourable.


Section 152 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Question not to be asked without reasonable grounds.


No such question as is referred to in section 151 ought to be asked, unless the person asking it has reasonable grounds for thinking that the imputation which it conveys is well-founded.


Illustrations.


(a) An advocate is instructed by another advocate that an important witness is a

dacoit. This is a reasonable ground for asking the witness whether he is a dacoit.


(b) An advocate is informed by a person in Court that an important witness is a dacoit. The informant, on being questioned by the advocate, gives satisfactory reasons for his statement. This is a reasonable ground for asking the witness whether he is a dacoit.


(c) A witness, of whom nothing whatever is known, is asked at random whether he is a dacoit. There are here no reasonable grounds for the question.


(d) A witness, of whom nothing whatever is known, being questioned as to his mode of life and means of living, gives unsatisfactory answers. This may be a reasonable ground for asking him if he is a dacoit.


Explore India’s first self paced judiciary coaching myjudix.com and get ahead with your judiciary preparation in a quick yet efficient manner. Contact us at myjudix.com to know more.


Section 153 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Procedure of Court in case of question being asked without reasonable grounds.


If the Court is of opinion that any such question was asked without reasonable grounds, it may, if it was asked by any advocate, report the circumstances of the case to the High Court or other authority to which such advocate is subject in the exercise of his profession.


Section 154 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Indecent and scandalous questions.


The Court may forbid any questions or inquiries which it regards as indecent or scandalous, although such questions or inquiries may have some bearing on the questions before the Court, unless they relate to facts in issue, or to matters necessary to be known in order to determine whether or not the facts in issue existed.


Section 155 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Questions intended to insult or annoy.


The Court shall forbid any question which appears to it to be intended to insult or annoy, or which, though proper in itself, appears to the Court needlessly offensive in form.


Section 156 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Exclusion of evidence to contradict answers to questions testing veracity.


When a witness has been asked and has answered any question which is relevant to the inquiry only in so far as it tends to shake his credit by injuring his character, no evidence shall be given to contradict him; but, if he answers falsely, he may afterwards be charged with giving false evidence.


Exception 1.—If a witness is asked whether he has been previously convicted of any crime and denies it, evidence may be given of his previous conviction.


Exception 2.—If a witness is asked any question tending to impeach his impartiality, and answers it by denying the facts suggested, he may be contradicted.


Illustrations.


(a) A claim against an underwriter is resisted on the ground of fraud. The claimant is asked whether, in a former transaction, he had not made a fraudulent claim. He denies it. Evidence is offered to show that he did make such a claim. The evidence is inadmissible.


(b) A witness is asked whether he was not dismissed from a situation for dishonesty. He denies it. Evidence is offered to show that he was dismissed for dishonesty. The evidence is not admissible.


(c) A affirms that on a certain day he saw B at Goa. A is asked whether he himself was not on that day at Varanasi. He denies it. Evidence is offered to show that A was on that day at Varanasi. The evidence is admissible, not as contradicting A on a fact which affects his credit, but as contradicting the alleged fact that B was seen on the day in question in Goa. In each of these cases, the witness might, if his denial was false, be charged with giving false evidence.


(d) A is asked whether his family has not had a blood feud with the family of B against whom he gives evidence. He denies it. He may be contradicted on the ground that the question tends to impeach his impartiality.


Section 157 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Question by party to his own witness.


(1) The Court may, in its discretion, permit the person who calls a witness to put any question to him which might be put in cross-examination by the adverse party.


(2) Nothing in this section shall disentitle the person so permitted under sub-section (1), to rely on any part of the evidence of such witness.


Section 158 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Impeaching credit of witness.


The credit of a witness may be impeached in the following ways by the adverse party, or, with the consent of the Court, by the party who calls him—


(a) by the evidence of persons who testify that they, from their knowledge of the witness, believe him to be unworthy of credit;


(b) by proof that the witness has been bribed, or has accepted the offer of a bribe, or has received any other corrupt inducement to give his evidence;


(c) by proof of former statements inconsistent with any part of his evidence which is liable to be contradicted.


Explanation.—A witness declaring another witness to be unworthy of credit may not, upon his examination-in-chief, give reasons for his belief, but he may be asked his reasons in cross-examination, and the answers which he gives cannot be contradicted, though, if they are false, he may afterwards be charged with giving false evidence.


Illustrations.


(a) A sues B for the price of goods sold and delivered to B. C says that he delivered the goods to B. Evidence is offered to show that, on a previous occasion, he said that he had not delivered goods to B. The evidence is admissible.


(b) A is accused of the murder of B. C says that B, when dying, declared that A had given B the wound of which he died. Evidence is offered to show that, on a previous occasion, C said that B, when dying, did not declare that A had given B the wound of which he died. The evidence is admissible.


Explore India’s first self paced judiciary coaching myjudix.com and get ahead with your judiciary preparation in a quick yet efficient manner. Contact us at myjudix.com to know more.


to read the next batch of section of BSA


Tap


BSA Section 149-158|Section 150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157 BSA|Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Bare Act

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Couldn’t Load Comments
It looks like there was a technical problem. Try reconnecting or refreshing the page.
bottom of page