top of page

BSA Section 89 to 99, Section 90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98 BSA Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Bare Act

Section 89 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Presumption as to books, maps and charts.


The Court may presume that any book to which it may refer for information on matters of public or general interest, and that any published map or chart, the statements of which are relevant facts, and which is produced for its inspection, was written and published by the person, and at the time and place, by whom or at which it purports to have been written or published.


Section 90 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Presumption as to electronic messages.


The Court may presume that an electronic message, forwarded by the originator through an electronic mail server to the addressee to whom the message purports to be addressed corresponds with the message as fed into his computer for transmission; but the Court shall not make any presumption as to the person by whom such message was sent.


Section 91 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Presumption as to due execution, etc., of documents not produced.


The Court shall presume that every document, called for and not produced after notice to produce, was attested, stamped and executed in the manner required by law.


Section 92 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Presumption as to documents thirty years old.


Where any document, purporting or proved to be thirty years old, is produced from any custody which the Court in the particular case considers proper, the Court may presume that the signature and every other part of such document, which purports to be in the handwriting of any particular person, is in that person's handwriting, and, in the case of a document executed or attested, that it was duly executed and attested by the persons by whom it purports to be executed and attested.


Explanation.—The Explanation to section 80 shall also apply to this section.


Illustrations.


(a) A has been in possession of landed property for a long time. He produces from his custody deeds relating to the land showing his titles to it. The custody shall be proper.


(b) A produces deeds relating to landed property of which he is the mortgagee. The mortgagor is in possession. The custody shall be proper.


(c) A, a connection of B, produces deeds relating to lands in B's possession, which were deposited with him by B for safe custody. The custody shall be proper.


Section 93 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Presumption as to electronic records five years old.


Where any electronic record, purporting or proved to be five years old, is produced from any custody which the Court in the particular case considers proper, the Court may presume that the electronic signature which purports to be the electronic signature of any particular person was so affixed by him or any person authorised by him in this behalf.


Explanation.—The Explanation to section 81 shall also apply to this section.


Explore India’s first self paced judiciary coaching myjudix.com and get ahead with your judiciary preparation in a quick yet efficient manner. Contact us at myjudix.com to know more.


CHAPTER VI


OF THE EXCLUSION OF ORAL EVIDENCE BY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE


Section 94 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Evidence of terms of contracts, grants and other dispositions of property reduced to form of document.


When the terms of a contract, or of a grant, or of any other disposition of property, have been reduced to the form of a document, and in all cases in which any matter is required by law to be reduced to the form of a document, no evidence shall be given in proof of the terms of such contract, grant or other disposition of property, or of such matter, except the document itself, or secondary evidence of its contents in cases in which secondary evidence is admissible under the provisions hereinbefore contained.


Exception 1.—When a public officer is required by law to be appointed in writing, and when it is shown that any particular person has acted as such officer, the writing by which he is appointed need not be proved.


Exception 2.—Wills admitted to probate in India may be proved by the probate.


Explanation 1.—This section applies equally to cases in which the contracts, grants or dispositions of property referred to are contained in one document, and to cases in which they are contained in more documents than one.


Explanation 2.—Where there are more originals than one, one original only need be proved.


Explanation 3.—The statement, in any document whatever, of a fact other than the facts referred to in this section, shall not preclude the admission of oral evidence as to the same fact.


Illustrations.


(a) If a contract be contained in several letters, all the letters in which it is contained

must be proved.


(b) If a contract is contained in a bill of exchange, the bill of exchange must be proved.


(c) If a bill of exchange is drawn in a set of three, one only need be proved.


(d) A contracts, in writing ,with B, for the delivery of indigouponcertainterms.The contract mentions the fact that B had paid A the price of other indigo contracted for verbally on another occasion. Oral evidence is offered that no payment was made for the other indigo. The evidence is admissible.


(e) A gives B a receipt for money paid by B. Oral evidence is offered of the payment. The evidence is admissible.


Section 95 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement.


When the terms of any such contract, grant or other disposition of property, or any matter required by law to be reduced to the form of a document, have been proved according to section 94, no evidence of any oral agreement or statement shall be admitted, as between the parties to any such instrument or their representatives in interest, for the

purpose of contradicting, varying, adding to, or subtracting from, its terms:


Provided that any fact may be proved which would invalidate any document, or which would entitle any person to any decree or order relating thereto; such as fraud, intimidation, illegality, want of due execution, want of capacity in any contracting party,

want or failure of consideration, or mistake in fact or law:


Provided further that the existence of any separate oral agreement as to any matter on which a document is silent, and which is not inconsistent with its terms, may be proved. In considering whether or not this proviso applies, the Court shall have regard to the degree of formality of the document:


Provided also that the existence of any separate oral agreement, constituting a condition precedent to the attaching of any obligation under any such contract, grant or disposition of property, may be proved:


Provided also that the existence of any distinct subsequent oral agreement to rescind or modify any such contract, grant or disposition of property, may be proved, except in cases in which such contract, grant or disposition of property is by law required to be in writing, or has been registered according to the law in force for the time being as to the registration of documents:


Provided also that any usage or custom by which incidents not expressly mentioned in any contract are usually annexed to contracts of that description, may be proved:


Provided also that the annexing of such incident would not be repugnant to, or inconsistent with, the express terms of the contract:


Provided also that any fact may be proved which shows in what manner the language of a document is related to existing facts.


Illustrations.


(a) A policy of insurance is effected on goods "in ships from Kolkata to Visakhapatnam". The goods are shipped in a particular ship which is lost. The fact that particular ship was orally excepted from the policy, cannot be proved.


(b) A agrees absolutely in writing to pay B one thousand rupees on the 1st March, 2023. The fact that, at the same time, an oral agreement was made that the money should not be paid till the 31st March, 2023, cannot be proved.


(c) An estate called "the Rampur tea estate" is sold by a deed which contains a map of the property sold. The fact that land not included in the map had always been regarded as part of the estate and was meant to pass by the deed cannot be proved.


(d) A enters into a written contract with B to work certain mines, the property of B, upon certain terms. A was induced to do so by a misrepresentation of B's as to their value. This fact may be proved.


(e) A institutes a suit against B for the specific performance of a contract, and also prays that the contract may be reformed as to one of its provisions, as that provision was inserted in it by mistake. A may prove that such a mistake was made as would by law entitle him to have the contract reformed.


(f) A orders goods of B  by a letter in which nothing is said as to the time of payment, and accepts the goods on delivery. B sues A for the price. A may show that the goods were supplied on credit for a term still unexpired.


(g) A sells B a horse and verbally warrants him sound. A gives B a paper in these words—"Bought of A a horse for thirty thousand rupees". B may prove the verbal warranty.


(h) A hires lodgings of B, and gives B a card on which is written—"Rooms, ten thousand rupees a month". A may prove a verbal agreement that these terms were to include partial board. A hires lodging of B for a year, and a regularly stamped agreement, drawn up by an advocate, is made between them. It is silent on the subject of board. A may not prove that board was included in the term verbally.


(i) A applies to B for a debt due to A by sending a receipt for the money. B keeps the receipt and does not send the money. In a suit for the amount, A may prove this.


(j) A and B make a contract in writing to take effect upon the happening of a certain contingency. The writing is left with B who sues A upon it. A may show the circumstances under which it was delivered.


Explore India’s first self paced judiciary coaching myjudix.com and get ahead with your judiciary preparation in a quick yet efficient manner. Contact us at myjudix.com to know more.


Section 96 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document.


When the language used in a document is, on its face, ambiguous or defective, evidence may not be given of facts which would show its meaning or supply its defects.


Illustrations.


(a) A agrees, in writing, to sell a horse to B for "one lakh rupees or one lakh fifty thousand rupees". Evidence cannot be given to show which price was to be given.


(b) A deed contains blanks. Evidence cannot be given of facts which would show how they were meant to be filled.


Section 97 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts.


When language used in a document is plain in itself, and when it applies accurately to existing facts, evidence may not be given to show that it was not meant to apply to such facts.


Illustration.


A sells to B, by deed, "my estate at Rampur containing one hundred bighas". A has an estate at Rampur containing one hundred bighas. Evidence may not be given of the fact that the estate meant to be sold was one situated at a different place and of a different size.


Section 98 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts.


When language used in a document is plain in itself, but is unmeaning in reference to existing facts, evidence may be given to show that it was used in a peculiar sense.


Illustration.


A sells to B, by deed, "my house in Kolkata". A had no house in Kolkata, but it appears that he had a house at Howrah, of which B had been in possession since the execution of the deed. These facts may be proved to show that the deed related to the house at Howrah.


Section 99 BSA | Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023


Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons.


When the facts are such that the language used might have been meant to apply to any one, and could not have been meant to apply to more than one, of several persons or things, evidence may be given of facts which show which of those persons or things it was intended to apply to.


Illustrations.


(a) A agrees to sell to B, for one thousand rupees, "my white horse". A has two white

horses. Evidence may be given of facts which show which of them was meant.


(b) A agrees to accompany B to Ramgarh. Evidence may be given of facts showing whether Ramgarh in Rajasthan or Ramgarh in Uttarakhand was meant.


Explore India’s first self paced judiciary coaching myjudix.com and get ahead with your judiciary preparation in a quick yet efficient manner. Contact us at myjudix.com to know more.


to read the next batch of section of BSA


Tap



BSA Section 89 to 99, Section 90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98 BSA Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam Bare Act


Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page